Team Blog

IT Professionals Need To Ramp Up Their Medical Connectivity “Quals”

by marilynhailperin@santarosaconsulting.com October 29, 2009 09:37

 

I had a true “aha” moment while sitting in the audience during Tim Gee’s presentation, “Everything is Connected at the Point of Care”, at the New Jersey and Delaware Valley Chapters of HIMSS Fall Conference last week. This was one of the first conferences I attended where I knew many of the attendees personally as I live in the area and have known these IT professionals and clinicians for many years. I watched the reaction of many of them during the presentation and chatted with several after the session. My conclusion? Nurses get it. Clinical engineers (though few and far between at the conference) get it.  Many IT professionals still do not.

What don’t they get? That there is a growing impact or even a true threat to patient health and safety from the rapid yet disconnected implementation of medical and information technology at the point of care. (More information cited by Tim can be found in the attached presentation or here, here, and here). To many of the IT professionals, connectivity is about plumbing. It is not. Medical device connectivity is all about workflow in the service of patient safety and the clinician.

I think it’s safe to say that every hospital represented at the conference is dealing with the following issues.

  1. Implementing sophisticated medical devices with embedded computing capabilities, including point of care diagnostic devices, patient monitors, telemetry packs, “smart” IV pumps, ventilators and spot vital signs devices
  2. Managing an array of communications modalities at the bedside including nurse call, overhead pages, PDAs, barcode readers, computers on wheels, pagers and wireless phones
  3. Nurses who must address an array of bedside tasks, not the least of which is hands-on patient care, but also documentation, alarm management, patient assessments and medication administration

The complexity and disparity of systems (people, process and technology) surrounding the point-of-care  can lead to noise, confusion, and an interrupt-driven environment with consequences such as alarm fatigue, failure to rescue, delays in care, and work flow poorly aligned with how clinicians really do their jobs.

If the vigorous bobbing of heads by the nurses seated in front of me was any indication, we are not managing this well.  What’s missing? I suggest it is the lack of strategic analysis to wrap our arms around this growing interrelated, multi-vendor ‘system-of-systems’.  Yes, each individual medical or information technology decision is assessed, but what about the big picture? Evaluating individual point-of-care applications in a vacuum can result in waste and complexity as previous phases are replaced or modified to support unanticipated impacts from subsequent phases.  We need  to apply the same rigor to evaluating needs, performing risk & budget assessments and taking the necessary steps to measure the impact of adding new component to the ‘system-of-systems’ that we do when replacing applications in our HIS systems.

It’s time for IT professionals to get into the game. They need to understand the interrelatedness of the complex clinical systems they are building piece by piece over time. They must actively contribute to the processes to select, implement & support all components of point of care technology – particularly as they “ride” on the hospital’s IT network.

An excellent reference for IT professionals is the publication, “Medical Technology for the IT Professional,” offered by ECRI Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to bringing the discipline of applied scientific research to discovering which medical procedures, devices, and drugs are best to improve patient care. Here’s what ECRI suggests every IT professional should know to assist their hospital to develop an effective ‘system of systems’.

  1. Understand the criticality of their work on patient care and recognize that diverse stakeholders must come together to select, implement & support point of care technology
    • Clinical groups (nursing, radiology)
    • Support groups (clinical engineering, biomed & IT)
    • Administrative groups (risk management, contracts/purchasing)
    • Technology vendors & manufacturers
  2. Understand the technology at point of care
    • Physiological monitors
    • Infusion technology
    • Asset tracking systems
    • Clinical laboratory
    • OR integration & surgical video systems
    • Anesthesia information systems
    • Telemedicine
    • Imaging systems
  3. Know how to
    • Integrate systems & devices in a multi-vendor environment
    • Develop an IT infrastructure to adequately support medical technology and devices
    • Implement reliable wireless systems
    • Comply with standards and regulations
    • Mitigate IT security issues
    • Ensure patient safety and reduce risks
  4. Be familiar with IT’s role with regard to compliance
    • Regulations governing medical devices
    • System security and accessibility
    • Hazard and recall management
    • Problem reporting and incident investigation
    • Service and support
    • Standards-related initiatives
    • Environmental concerns

Let’s get going…

Marilyn Hailperin
Associate Partner
Santa Rosa Consulting, LLC

Everything Is Connected at the Point of Care by Tim Gee_DV-NJ HIMSS.pdf (3.89 mb)

Share this post: Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Twitter Share on facebook

Comments

October 25, 2009 00:46 #

Hi Marilyn - This is a great post, thanks for sharing Tim's presentation!  The clients that I am working with lately have a vague understanding that "meaningful use" will include patient care device integration but they all need our help understanding the complexity of making PCDI happen effectively.  

Joe Lavelle

October 25, 2009 01:07 #

Marilyn - as Joe said this type of integration is part of meaningful use - simply stated you have to do this to be meaningful use compliant which directly translates to ARRA/Stimulus $$$.  

One of the challenges in the IT shops is the compartmentalization - interface folks only interfaces, network guys only network, and so on.  In many case this compartmentalization and working in a vacuum sets with the IT leadership. It is up to the IT leadership to ensure their teams understand the impact of their work directly on the delivery of care. Sadly as the old management adage goes - the team is a reflection of the management.  So as we go out and help our clients we should gently prod the IT leadership to lead the charge to understand what is needed in today's system of system world (referencing the ECRI article).

Dale Will

October 25, 2009 01:07 #

Marilyn, once again, terrific and informative

Bruce Grambley

October 25, 2009 01:31 #

Thanks for breaking it down Marilyn. The resources are great, too.

Bob Dessy

October 25, 2009 01:38 #

Marilyn,

Great insights!  I always say technology is "Great" when it works and "Really Bad" when it does not.  In my personal experiences I have seen technology fail when the focus is primarily on the technology itself, not the "People, Processes & Technology".  Your suggestions to IT professionals are great, they will be far more successful if they embrace these concepts!

Reta Lock

October 26, 2009 00:59 #

I came across another great post on PCDI today:

Getting Devices to Talk to EHRs http://ow.ly/zckl

Joe Lavelle

November 02, 2009 00:32 #

Great article, Marilyn.
The structure of many organizations is set up to be highly specialized in functional areas, and it has been an effective model but it does not foster system-level thinking, which is important for strategizing connectivity. I frankly think this goes beyond just IT department, organizations as a whole need to assess their understanding of system of systems and put together a multidiciplinary team to tackle connectivity and integration issues.

Linda Chan

November 26, 2009 13:54 #

ECRI Institute couldn't agree more!  (Thanks for the shout out)

Big changes are coming, or should be coming with meaningful use, but we have to avoid at all costs garbage in garbage out and help redesign the care processes with better/new uses of appropriately selected technology.  Just because its new or more powerful doesn't mean much with actual patient care - what healthcare IT technology is truly useful is a big evaluation all hospitals are facing.

Rob Maliff

Comments are closed